The Klexaro Blog

The Science of
Brand Naming

A five-part series covering sound symbolism research, phonetic scoring, pronunciation engines, and how a Sound Print becomes a complete visual identity brief — all grounded in peer-reviewed linguistics.

Series — 5 posts
1
Brand Naming Has Two Unsolved Problems. Almost Nobody Addresses Both.
Most founders start where we did — asking AI for names, then realising there was no principled way to evaluate any of them. That frustration is the starting point.
2
What Sound Symbolism Actually Says — And Why It Changes How You Name a Brand
The peer-reviewed foundation behind the framework — Klink (2000), Pathak et al., Nielsen & Rendall, and why Chanel scores 100% Luxury fit before a designer has touched a brief.
3
How Klexaro Scores a Brand Name — Every Point, Explained
Four sequential steps. Strategic Fit (70%) and Technical Quality (30%). Every point awarded or deducted is transparent and traceable to a specific phonetic property.
4
The Pronunciation Engine — Why Accurate Phoneme Extraction Is Everything
CMU Pronouncing Dictionary (133,854 entries), 2,800+ brand names, and a 6MB on-device neural network for invented words. All on-device, all private.
5
From Sound Print to Brand Identity — The Orchestration Layer
The Sound Print doesn't just score a name — it contains enough structured data to brief an entire visual identity. Eight generation engines. Engineered AI prompts. The complete output chain.

This series is based on We Tried to Make Brand Naming Scientific. Here's What We Built. — the original Medium article by Klexaro Labs covering the full framework from first principles.

Try Klexaro — Free

Sound Print, Strategic Fit Score, collision detection across 2,800+ brands, engineered AI prompts. All analysis runs entirely on-device — your naming ideas stay private.

Download on App Store →